ArticleScientific reports2025
Oral microbiome dysbiosis in women with a history of pregnancy loss: a metagenomic cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Foetal Development and Placental Health in Response to Apical Periodontitis Induced in Pregnant Wistar Rats.International endodontic journal · 2026Article
- The Maternal Microbiome in Pregnancy: From Physiological Changes to Dysbiosis and Obstetrical Complications-Therapeutic Perspectives.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Shotgun metagenomic mapping of saliva reveals insights into diversity and function of the oral microbiome in pregnancy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Miscarriage and the Microbiome: Host Genetics, Immunity, and the Reproductive Tract Ecosystem.Genes · 2026Review
- Microbiome, Epigenetics, and Nutritional Factors in Shaping Perinatal Pregnancy Outcomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Efficacy of very low calorie diet in the intervention of obesity and the changes in oral microbiota: a prospective cohort study.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Observational
- The role of oral dysbiosis in pregnancy complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preterm birth.Journal of oral microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pregnancy loss is a prevalent condition among women of reproductive age, significantly affecting fertility and psychological well-being. Despite advances in understanding the etiology of pregnancy loss, the role of the oral microbiome-its composition and metabolic activity-in influencing pregnancy outcomes remains underexplored. Previous studies have suggested that imbalances in the microbiota may contribute to adverse health outcomes, but few have investigated its association with pregnancy loss specifically. A total of 182 women of childbearing age were recruited for this study and divided into two groups: those with a history of pregnancy loss (n = 70) and a control group with no history of adverse pregnancy outcomes (n = 112). Clinical data and buccal mucosa samples were collected for metagenomic analysis. The inclusion of participants was based on their reproductive history, with particular attention to selecting women with at least one confirmed pregnancy loss and those with at least one successful live birth to serve as controls. The oral microbiota of women in the pregnancy loss group exhibited significantly lower richness and diversity compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Notably, specific genera such as Faecalibacterium, Roseburia, and Bacteroides were positively correlated with pregnancy loss, whereas Pseudomonas and Leptotrichia were correlated with it. These findings suggest a potential microbial dysbiosis associated with pregnancy loss. Our study identifies significant oral microbiota dysbiosis in women with pregnancy loss, characterized by reduced diversity and altered metabolic pathways. These findings underscore the potential role of oral microbial imbalance in adverse pregnancy outcomes. While our cross-sectional design and sample heterogeneity limit causal inference, they highlight the need for longitudinal cohorts and mechanistic studies. Future research integrating multi-niche microbiome profiling (e.g., gut and vaginal microbiota) is essential to unravel systemic interactions and advance targeted interventions for reproductive health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.