ArticleScientific reports2025
Survival outcomes among patients with breast cancer and leptomeningeal disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of radiation therapy in leptomeningeal disease from breast cancer - a multicenter analysis.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Brain-only metastatic breast cancer as a distinct clinical entity: evidence from national and institutional cohorts with implications for radiation therapy.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Enhanced prognostic score for breast cancer brain metastases incorporating contemporary clinical features and leptomeningeal disease: Development and validation.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- Trojan horses at leptomeningeal cellular gates: Antibody-drug conjugates deliver cytotoxic payloads.Med (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Clinical-pathological patterns and prognosis of young women with breast cancer brain metastases: a single-center retrospective study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- IBCar: Potent Orally Bioavailable MethylCancers · 2025Article
- Patterns and risk factors of intracranial recurrence after surgical resection of brain metastases from malignant tumors.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advances in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) management, leptomeningeal disease (LMD) prognosis remains poor. This study evaluates clinicopathological and treatment factors influencing outcomes of MBC patients with LMD treated with radiotherapy (RT). We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with MBC treated with RT for brain metastases (BrM) between 2005 and 2019. LMD diagnosis was made via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Multivariable analysis (MVA) identified variables associated with brain-specific progression-free survival (bsPFS) and overall survival (OS). Among 691 MBC patients treated with RT for BrM, 161 (23%) had LMD, either at initial presentation (50/161) or after BrM treatment. Patients with LMD were younger, more likely to have ER + disease, more likely to have undergone surgery for BrM, and less likely to have received prior whole-brain RT. HER2+ LMD was associated with longer bsPFS (HR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25-0.86, p = 0.01) and OS (HR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.2-0.75, p = 0.002). Median OS for triple-negative breast cancer was 3.7 months, 5.1 months for HR+/HER2 - and 15.4 months for HER2 + MBC. HER2-targeted therapy, either at or after LMD diagnosis, improved long-term survival (> 2 years) (Fisher's test, p < 0.05). Low Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS < 60) was linked to shorter bsPFS (HR 2.91, 95% CI: 1.49-5.69, p < 0.01) and OS (HR 3.37, 95% CI: 1.78-6.41, p < 0.001). These findings highlight the need for effective CNS-penetrating systemic therapies for HER2-negative breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.