ArticleScientific reports2025
Gross-Pitaevskii systems of fractional order with respect to multicomponent solitary wave dynamics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Propagation of solitary waves for hydrodynamical nonlinear complex model in a fractional derivative setting.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- On the exploration of periodic wave soliton solutions to the nonlinear integrable Akbota equation by using a generalized extended analytical method.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a comparative analysis of the fractional Gross-Pitaevskii equation (GPE), a fundamental nonlinear Schrödinger-type model, focusing on the derivation of exact soliton solutions critical for understanding nonlinear phenomena such as superfluidity and superconductivity. We compare the effectiveness of β-fractional and M-truncated fractional derivatives in solving the complex fractional GPE. This comparison reveals that while both fractional derivatives enable the construction of diverse optical soliton solutions-including hyperbolic, periodic, Jacobi elliptic, and exponential forms-the β-derivative provides smoother soliton profiles with computational simplicity, whereas the M-truncated derivative captures richer oscillatory dynamics due to its enhanced memory effects. Employing advanced analytical tools-namely the generalized extended direct algebraic method (gEDAM) and the Kummar-Malik (KM) method-along with Wolfram Mathematica for verification, we extract and rigorously validate a variety of exact solutions. The generated solutions and their corresponding wave profiles under varying parameters highlight the distinct physical implications of each fractional derivative approach. Our results offer a robust framework for modeling nonlinear fractional dynamics, with applications spanning optical fibers, plasma physics, mathematical physics, and condensed matter systems. The comparative insights gained deepen the understanding of fractional-order effects in nonlinear wave evolution, paving the way for further exploration in complex physical systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.