ArticleScientific reports2025
Neural responses to perceptual and sexual ambiguity in facial images: an ERP and time-frequency analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the neural effects of perceptual (caused by blur processing) and sexual ambiguity (induced by morphing manipulation) in facial images via event-related potentials and time-frequency analysis. Gaussian blur and morphing of male and female faces were used to create gradually ambiguous face images, and participants completed a sexual dimorphism judgment task. Results revealed that the N170 was strongly affected by blur, which suggested that it disrupted the structural encoding of faces. The early posterior negativity exhibited a different response compared with the N170, which indicated that it may reflect both bottom-up processing due to lack of visual cues and top-down processing driven by the sexual dimorphism judgment task. Additionally, late posterior potential amplitude increased under conditions of explicit perceptual and sexual faces, which confirmed that ease of interpretation in sexual dimorphism judgments influenced neural responses. Furthermore, the time-frequency analysis revealed that high-frequency gamma activity at approximately 200 ms was associated with extracting and evaluating facial features, whereas activity after 600 ms reflected processes related to retaining facial information. These findings suggest that visual processing and semantic evaluation of faces rely on complex mechanisms influenced by both the clarity of physical cues and task context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.