ArticleScientific reports2025
Genetic isolation of an amphidromous goby species, Luciogobius ryukyuensis, highlights limited gene flow in small island populations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Amphidromous fish could be transported to other habitats during the marine pelagic larval phase by ocean currents, but extent and mechanism of the larval dispersal is poorly known. Since island stream habitats are generally small and fragile, it is very important to understand the connectivity between streams and between islands from the perspective of biodiversity conservation. In the present study, we investigated the genetic connectivity among populations of an amphidromous goby species, Luciogobius ryukyuensis, on four islands (Okinawa, Kume, Ishigaki, and Iriomote) of the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan. The genome-wide SNPs analyses revealed that the populations of L. ryukyuensis from the four islands are genetically distinguishable. This suggested that larval transport of this species between these four islands is very limited. On the other hand, the mitochondrial genome analysis clearly divided the species into only two populations (Okinawa + Kume and Ishigaki + Iriomote). This may indicate that there was more recent genetic exchange between the two neighboring islands than between more distant islands. The populations on Kume, Ishigaki, and Iriomote islands are particularly small, with only two or three very small habitats on each island. Maintaining all existing habitats will be critical for conservation of the present diversity of the species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.