ArticleScientific reports2025
Development, verification, and comparison of a risk stratification model to identify potential population benefiting from chemotherapy in non-metastatic male breast cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To establish a prognostic stratification nomogram for non-metastatic male breast cancer to determine which patients can benefit from chemotherapy. A population-based study was conducted using data collected from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Cox proportional hazards analysis identified significant prognostic factors for survival. A prognostic stratification model was developed using R software. Propensity score matching was implemented to balance characteristics between the chemotherapy cohort and the non-chemotherapy cohort. The multivariate analyses indicated that age, race, grade, surgery, primary tumor, marital status, T stage, and N stage were independent prognostic factors for overall survival in non-metastatic metastatic MBC patients who did not receive chemotherapy (all P < 0.05). The C-index was 0.786 (95% CI 0.662-0.870) in the training cohort and 0.763 (95% CI 0.517-0.852) in the validation cohort. The nomogram effectively discriminated between low-risk, moderate-risk, and high-risk groups concerning OS (P < 0.0001). The current study developed the first prognostic stratification nomogram for non-metastatic MBC and identified that patients in the moderate-risk and high-risk groups are more likely to benefit from chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.