ArticleNature communications2025
High-coverage allele-resolved single-cell DNA methylation profiling reveals cell lineage, X-inactivation state, and replication dynamics.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- DNA methylation and machine learning: challenges and perspective toward enhanced clinical diagnostics.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Review
- Placental DNA methylation key topics: sex- and cell-type specificity, mediation, multi-omics, and biomarker discovery.Epigenomics · 2025Review
- Regulatory T cell transdifferentiation as a driver of obesity and diabetes.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA methylation patterns at crucial short sequence features, such as enhancers and promoters, may convey key information about cell lineage and state. The need for high-resolution single-cell DNA methylation profiling has therefore become increasingly apparent. Existing single-cell whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (scWGBS) studies have both methodological and analytical shortcomings. Inefficient library generation and low CpG coverage mostly preclude direct cell-to-cell comparisons and necessitate the use of cluster-based analyses, imputation of methylation states, or averaging of DNA methylation measurements across large genomic bins. Such summarization methods obscure the interpretation of methylation states at individual regulatory elements and limit our ability to discern important cell-to-cell differences. We report an improved scWGBS method, single-cell Deep and Efficient Epigenomic Profiling of methyl-C (scDEEP-mC), which offers efficient generation of high-coverage libraries. scDEEP-mC allows for cell type identification, genome-wide profiling of hemi-methylation, and allele-resolved analysis of X-inactivation epigenetics in single cells. Furthermore, we combine methylation and copy-number data from scDEEP-mC to identify single, actively replicating cells and profile DNA methylation maintenance dynamics during and after DNA replication. These analyses unlock further avenues for exploring DNA methylation regulation and dynamics and illustrate the power of high-complexity, highly efficient scWGBS library construction as facilitated by scDEEP-mC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.