ArticleNature communications2025
Gated CO
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pore Geometry and Nitrogen Doping Regulate Carbon-Source Transport Through Carbon Nanocage Shells for CONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bidirectional Size Control for Angstrom-Scale Graphene Pores by Competitive Growth and Etching.Nano letters · 2026Article
- Tuning Pore Size in Porous Graphene Membrane for OAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Scalable room temperature incorporation of CONature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oxidation of graphene has been successfully used to incorporate semiquinone (C = O)-functionalized Å-scale pores, yielding attractive carbon capture performance. However, the true potential of such pores has remained unclear due to a lack of dedicated mechanistic studies. Herein, using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we show that C = O displays a strong molecular-interaction-dependent dynamic motion, leading to a distribution in the pore limiting diameter (PLD), comparable to the size differences between CO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.