ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and evaluation of machine learning training strategies for neonatal mortality prediction using multicountry data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kenyan Neonatal Mortality Risk Predictor: Protocol for a User-Centered Design Evaluation.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Infant mortality across EU health systems: heterogeneity encoding, fixed effects regression, and machine learning in a small macro panel.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal mortality poses a critical challenge in global health, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Leveraging advancements in technology, such as machine learning (ML) algorithms, offers the potential to improve neonatal care by enabling precise prediction and prevention of mortality risks. This study utilized the Maternal and Neonatal Health Registry (MNHR) dataset from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), encompassing multicentric neonatal data across various countries, to evaluate the effectiveness of ML in predicting neonatal mortality risk. We compared three training approaches: a generalized model applicable across all countries, country-specific models tailored to local healthcare characteristics, and a model derived from the largest single-country dataset. Utilizing data from 2010 to 2016 for training and validation from 2017 to 2019, our analysis included 575,664 pregnancies and assessed five ML algorithms based on key neonatal health indicators recommended by the World Health Organization. Notably, the generalized model demonstrated the highest predictive performance, achieving an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.816, highlighting the benefits of leveraging a diverse dataset. Our findings advocate for the integration of generalized ML models into healthcare strategies to improve neonatal health outcomes and emphasize the importance of data diversity in reducing neonatal mortality rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.