Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40624031›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development and evaluation of machine learning training strategies for neonatal mortality prediction using multicountry data.

Gabriel Ferreira Dos Santos Silva, Roberta Moreira Wichmann, Francisco Costa da Silva Junior, Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabriel Ferreira Dos Santos SilvaSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 715 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, 01246-904, SP, Brazil. gabriel8.silva@usp.br.
Roberta Moreira WichmannEconomics Graduate Program, IDP - Brazilian Institute of Education, Development and Research, Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
Francisco Costa da Silva JuniorInstituto de Pesquisa em Inteligência Artificial Aplicada à Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto FilhoSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 715 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, 01246-904, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal mortality poses a critical challenge in global health, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Leveraging advancements in technology, such as machine learning (ML) algorithms, offers the potential to improve neonatal care by enabling precise prediction and prevention of mortality risks. This study utilized the Maternal and Neonatal Health Registry (MNHR) dataset from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), encompassing multicentric neonatal data across various countries, to evaluate the effectiveness of ML in predicting neonatal mortality risk. We compared three training approaches: a generalized model applicable across all countries, country-specific models tailored to local healthcare characteristics, and a model derived from the largest single-country dataset. Utilizing data from 2010 to 2016 for training and validation from 2017 to 2019, our analysis included 575,664 pregnancies and assessed five ML algorithms based on key neonatal health indicators recommended by the World Health Organization. Notably, the generalized model demonstrated the highest predictive performance, achieving an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.816, highlighting the benefits of leveraging a diverse dataset. Our findings advocate for the integration of generalized ML models into healthcare strategies to improve neonatal health outcomes and emphasize the importance of data diversity in reducing neonatal mortality rates.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityMachine LearningAlgorithmsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyRegistriesROC CurveUnited StatesArtificial intelligenceData-driven interventionsHealth disparitiesMortality risk predictionMulticentric dataNeonatal health

Identifiers

PMID40624031
PMCPMC12234737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.