Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40624021›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development of a short form of the Swedish version of the Hemophilia Activities List.

Elisabeth Brodin, Katharina S Sunnerhagen, Åsa Lundgren Nilsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elisabeth Brodin *Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Vita Stråket 12, fl. 4, 413 46, Gothenburg, Sweden. elisabeth.brodin@gu.se.
Katharina S Sunnerhagen *Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Vita Stråket 12, fl. 4, 413 46, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Åsa Lundgren Nilsson *Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Vita Stråket 12, fl. 4, 413 46, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An evaluation of an individual's function, activity, and participation in everyday life is an important component of long-term follow-up in health care. The Hemophilia Activities List (HAL) is an instrument that focuses on self-assessed activities and participation in individuals. The original HAL included 42 questions, many of which covered themes that overlapped with one another. To reduce the length of this questionnaire, data collected from the HAL from Swedish persons with hemophilia were analyzed using a three-step process including Rasch modeling, an equidiscriminatory item-total correlation approach, and patient views. Results obtained were combined to generate a 14-item questionnaire. Of note, although it was not considered a separate entity, the function of the upper extremities was addressed as a component of several other domains. The 14-item short form yielded median scores of 85.5 (range 11-100), which were similar to those achieved using the original 42-item version (median score 83, range 13-100). The short form can be used to complement other self-assessment instruments as part of an annual follow-up and will be particularly helpful to identify issues and follow activity and participation over time.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingHemophilia AAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenYoung AdultActivitiesHemophiliaParticipationPatient-reported outcomeQuestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID40624021
PMCPMC12234653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.