ArticleScientific reports2025
Development of a short form of the Swedish version of the Hemophilia Activities List.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An evaluation of an individual's function, activity, and participation in everyday life is an important component of long-term follow-up in health care. The Hemophilia Activities List (HAL) is an instrument that focuses on self-assessed activities and participation in individuals. The original HAL included 42 questions, many of which covered themes that overlapped with one another. To reduce the length of this questionnaire, data collected from the HAL from Swedish persons with hemophilia were analyzed using a three-step process including Rasch modeling, an equidiscriminatory item-total correlation approach, and patient views. Results obtained were combined to generate a 14-item questionnaire. Of note, although it was not considered a separate entity, the function of the upper extremities was addressed as a component of several other domains. The 14-item short form yielded median scores of 85.5 (range 11-100), which were similar to those achieved using the original 42-item version (median score 83, range 13-100). The short form can be used to complement other self-assessment instruments as part of an annual follow-up and will be particularly helpful to identify issues and follow activity and participation over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.