ArticleLight, science & applications2025
Uncertainty-aware Fourier ptychography.
Article in Light, science & applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pushing the resolution limit of coherent diffractive imaging.Light, science & applications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fourier ptychography (FP) offers both wide field-of-view and high-resolution holographic imaging, making it valuable for applications ranging from microscopy and X-ray imaging to remote sensing. However, its practical implementation remains challenging due to the requirement for precise numerical forward models that accurately represent real-world imaging systems. This sensitivity to model-reality mismatches makes FP vulnerable to physical uncertainties, including misalignment, optical element aberrations, and data quality limitations. Conventional approaches address these challenges through separate methods: manual calibration or digital correction for misalignment; pupil or probe reconstruction to mitigate aberrations; or data quality enhancement through exposure adjustments or high dynamic range (HDR) techniques. Critically, these methods cannot simultaneously address the interconnected uncertainties that collectively degrade imaging performance. We introduce Uncertainty-Aware FP (UA-FP), a comprehensive framework that simultaneously addresses multiple system uncertainties without requiring complex calibration and data collection procedures. Our approach develops a fully differentiable forward imaging model that incorporates deterministic uncertainties (misalignment and optical aberrations) as optimizable parameters, while leveraging differentiable optimization with domain-specific priors to address stochastic uncertainties (noise and data quality limitations). Experimental results demonstrate that UA-FP achieves superior reconstruction quality under challenging conditions. The method maintains robust performance with reduced sub-spectrum overlap requirements and retains high-quality reconstructions even with low bit sensor data. Beyond improving image reconstruction, our approach enhances system reconfigurability and extends FP's capabilities as a measurement tool suitable for operation in environments where precise alignment and calibration are impractical.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.