Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40623876›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Impact of vaccine mandates and removals on COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Australia and international comparators: a study protocol.

Aregawi Gebremedhin Gebremariam, Mesfin Genie, Huong Le, Katie Attwell, Bette Liu, Annette K Regan, Frank H Beard, Kristine Macartney, Francesco Paolucci, Hannah Catherine Moore and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aregawi Gebremedhin GebremariamNewcastle Business School, The University of Newcastle Australia, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia aregawi.gebremariam@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9518-8947
Mesfin GenieNewcastle Business School, The University of Newcastle Australia, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Huong LeWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4630-5734
Katie AttwellSchool of Social Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0366-2160
Bette LiuSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Annette K ReganDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3879-6193
Frank H BeardNational Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9151-4781
Kristine MacartneyNational Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4675-0232
Francesco PaolucciNewcastle Business School, The University of Newcastle Australia, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Hannah Catherine MooreWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6434-8290
Christopher C BlythWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination against SARS-CoV-2 was a crucial public health measure during the COVID-19 pandemic. Among the multiple strategies developed to increase vaccine uptake, governments often employed vaccine mandates. However, little evidence exists globally about the impact of these mandates and their subsequent removal on vaccine uptake, including in Australia, France, Italy and the USA. The aim of this study is to provide a protocol to evaluate and quantify the impact of COVID-19 vaccine mandates and removals on vaccine uptake in these countries, with a specific focus on comparing Australian policies with those from Europe and the USA. Actualising the work outlined in this protocol will help to provide policy and technical guidance for future pandemic preparedness and routine immunisation programmes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol outlines a retrospective study using existing data sources including Australian Immunisation Register-Person Level Integrated Data Asset for Australia and publicly available data for France, Italy and California (USA). Causal inference methods such as interrupted time series, regression discontinuity design, difference-in-differences, matching and synthetic control will be employed to assess the estimated effects of vaccine mandates and removals on vaccine uptake. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of Newcastle's human research ethics committee has approved the study (reference number: H-2024-0160). Peer-reviewed papers will be submitted, and results will be presented at public health, immunisation and health economic conferences nationally and internationally. A lay summary will be published on the MandEval website.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesImmunization ProgramsMandatory ProgramsVaccinationAustraliaEuropeHealth PolicyHumansItalyMandatory VaccinationResearch DesignRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2United StatesCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19Health policyVaccination

Identifiers

PMID40623876
PMCPMC12258311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.