Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40623858›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2025

Implementation of a multicomponent intervention including clinical decision support (CDS), e-course and feedback to improve general practitioners' radiology referrals: a feasibility study and study protocol.

Aslak Bjarne Aslaksen, Mia Louise Halsvik Mowinckel-Nilsen, Stefán Hjörleifsson, Nicolas Melchior Frederic Øyane, Satya Pal Sharma, Erik Vang, Miriam Hartveit, Stig Harthug

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aslak Bjarne AslaksenRadiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway aslak.bjarne.aslaksen@helse-bergen.no.ORCID 0009-0005-8257-0887
Mia Louise Halsvik Mowinckel-NilsenRadiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Stefán HjörleifssonDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5936-0161
Nicolas Melchior Frederic ØyaneDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8631-5665
Satya Pal SharmaDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7243-8066
Erik VangRadiology, Betanien Hospital, Fyllingsdalen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0009-0004-2369-1112
Miriam HartveitDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Stig HarthugDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Bergen, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0163-2881

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOveruse of high-cost imaging like MRI and CT scans is a growing concern, with 4-100% of examinations deemed of low value. This contributes to unnecessary healthcare costs and patient risks such as overdiagnosis. Norwegian general practitioners (GPs) demonstrate variable referral practices, with many referrals being inconsistent with guidelines. The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and usability of 'VeRaVest,' a multicomponent intervention targeting improved radiology referral practices among GPs in Western Norway.

methodsThe intervention combined three elements: (1) referral guidelines integrated into electronic systems, (2) group-based courses on guideline compliance using quality improvement principles and (3) a web-based feedback system. The study was conducted with 139 GPs recruited in two cohorts in 2023, evaluated using a step-wedge design. Data sources included qualitative feedback from GPs and quantitative measures like referral completion rates. Participants' referral data were anonymised and analysed using a PACS/RIS (Pictures Archive and Communications System/Radiology Information System) system.

resultsPreliminary results indicate high GP satisfaction with the intervention. About 76% of participants reported changes in referral practices, including improved indication assessments, better referral descriptions and enhanced patient communication. GPs emphasised the importance of accessible guidelines, peer-based learning and actionable feedback. Integration of decision support tools and guideline-based training was pivotal in aligning practices with national standards. DISCUSSION: The multicomponent VeRaVest intervention demonstrated feasibility and potential to reduce low-value imaging practices. Success hinged on embedding guidelines into workflows, fostering peer engagement and ensuring practical relevance. Future evaluations will focus on quantitative outcomes, including referral rates and quality. Findings suggest scalability to other healthcare settings and regions.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalFeedbackGeneral PractitionersRadiologyReferral and ConsultationFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansNorwayQuality ImprovementClinical practice guidelinesDiagnostic ImagingGeneral practiceImplementation science

Identifiers

PMID40623858
PMCPMC12258298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.