ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Unveiling team needs: a qualitative study of simulation training for endovascular cerebral thrombectomy.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reducing Door-to-Puncture Time with a Streamlined MRI-First Workflow for Endovascular Thrombectomy.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Article
- Engaging anaesthesia professionals as co-faculty in stroke thrombectomy simulation training: associations with clinical care and patient outcomes.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective multidisciplinary teamwork is crucial for successful endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) treatment, a critical stroke intervention classified as a non-operating room anaesthesia (NORA) procedure. Our hospital incorporated EVT training into regular stroke simulation training. This study aimed to investigate team members' experiences of simulation training in preparation for clinical EVT, including how the training and related clinical procedures could be improved to address their identified needs.
methodsSix focus group interviews (one anaesthesia-only professional, five mixed healthcare professionals) were conducted with a purposeful sample of EVT team members. The data were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis.
resultsEVT team members considered simulation training an essential introduction to the clinical procedure, particularly for familiarisation with the angio suite, equipment, team roles and communication. However, they reported that the simulation did not prepare them for challenges inherent to NORA procedures encountered during clinical EVT. These included managing multidisciplinary task interactions, maintaining haemodynamic and respiratory stability, and working within spatial and access constraints. Consequently, the experience of disorganised teamwork persisted in clinical EVT. The team members reported a lack of shared understanding of roles, responsibilities and communication expectations, particularly between anaesthesia professionals and other team members. This contributed to unfamiliarity with team dynamics and workflow. The clinical EVT team leader inconsistently facilitated collaboration, impacting team communication and effectiveness. The participants proposed modifications to the simulation training and clinical procedure to address these issues.
conclusionsOur study highlights the need to incorporate the multidisciplinary challenges of NORA procedures into EVT simulation training, emphasising active input from all professional groups involved in the EVT team, particularly anaesthesia. Practical recommendations for planning and implementing such simulation training are proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.