SynthesisEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2025
Impact of same day emergency care services on urgent and emergency care delivery outcomes: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Follow-up pathways, investigation utilisation, and general practitioner communication following acute medical unit assessment: A six-month retrospective service evaluation.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Workflow Bottlenecks and Staff Readiness in an NHS Emergency Urology Clinic: A Prospective Service Evaluation to Inform Future AI-Supported Triage.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of a Stroke Same Day Emergency Care Service on MRI Wait Times and Patient Flow in Mild Stroke Presentations.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSame day emergency care (SDEC) describes an ambulatory service designed to provide an alternative to ED management, reduce admission rates and improve emergency care system performance. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesise the evidence base for SDEC and its impact on urgent and emergency healthcare delivery.
methodsEight bibliographic databases were searched, including: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, the Science and Social Science Citation Indices in the Web of Science Core Collection, Health Management Information Consortium, the Cochrane Library and Epistemonikos. Study selection, extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. Given the clinical heterogeneity and weakness of the evidence base to determine intervention effect, a narrative synthesis was performed. Formal assessment of implementation was undertaken using the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set.
resultsWe identified 1283 citations, with 21 publications reporting 20 evaluations (18 UK and 2 Australia). SDEC services were heterogeneous in terms of referral sources, patient selection and specialties provided. Studies were mostly single centre and compared SDEC care with alternative services (such as ED) or compared outcomes before and during SDEC implementation. Patients receiving SDEC demonstrated same-day discharge ranging from 38.3% to >92%. 30-day mortality varied between <1% and 6% (four studies). Change in 30-day ED or SDEC reattendance was not examined. A learning curve was indicated in two studies, with inappropriate or 'rejected' referrals reducing from 31% to 18% in one SDEC service. Where reported, triage was led by senior clinical decision-makers, however, the appropriateness of SDEC referrals was also complicated by contextual factors. Comparative evaluation, including inpatient admissions, generally favoured SDEC care, but study designs carried a high risk of bias and confounding.
conclusionsLimited evidence suggests that implementing SDEC services is feasible and may increase same-day discharge but with variable 30-day mortality (very-low or low confidence) and unexamined change in 30-day ED or SDEC reattendance. Clinical heterogeneity and limited reporting make it difficult to characterise SDEC services. Implementation, although with varied referral criteria, proved feasible given the involvement of senior clinical decision-makers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.