ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2025
Identifying and characterising asthma subgroups at high risk of severe exacerbations using machine learning and longitudinal real-world data.
Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Five tenets for advancing evidence-based precision medicine.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- A clinician-oriented machine learning model for adult asthma exacerbation prediction: comparative analysis of nine algorithms.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo identify and characterise distinct subgroups of patients with asthma with severe acute exacerbations (AEs) by using a multistep clustering methodology that combines supervised and unsupervised machine learning.
methodsThis cohort study used anonymised, all-payer medical and prescription US claim data from October 2015 to May 2022. First, gradient-boosted decision trees were trained to predict AE in 4 132 973 patients with asthma, of whom 86 735 experienced AE. This model was applied to a holdout set of 86 434 patients with asthma with AE to derive SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. SHAP values were then subjected to non-linear dimensionality reduction and density-based clustering to identify distinct subgroups among these patients. These subgroups were described using key clinical and demographic characteristics.
resultsClustering identified five distinct subgroups of patients with asthma with AE, broadly differentiated by histories of acute care encounters, healthcare utilisation, AE treatments, coded asthma severity, specialist encounters, first-hand tobacco exposure, mood disorders and patient demographics. Notably, there was considerable between-cluster variability in the predicted likelihood of AE, with some subgroups comprised of patients who posed a challenge for the predictive model and would have been missed with predictive modelling alone. DISCUSSION: By identifying distinct subgroups among patients with asthma experiencing AE, this study highlights the heterogeneity within this population and emphasises the need for more personalised management of AE.
conclusionApplying predictive modelling and clustering to real-world data can help identify discrete phenotypes of patients and offer an important source of information for developing risk assessment and mitigation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.