Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40623699›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2025

Perinatal risk assessment in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth restriction: development and internal validation of a prediction model for composite adverse perinatal outcome.

M van de Meent, E W Bel, W Ganzevoort, S J Gordijn, F Groenendaal, E M W Kooi, W Onland, E Schuit, A T Lely, J Kooiman

Abstract readValidation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

M van de MeentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3431-6591
E W BelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
W GanzevoortDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7243-2115
S J GordijnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3915-8609
F GroenendaalDepartment of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
E M W KooiDivision of Neonatology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
W OnlandAmsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
E SchuitJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
A T LelyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J KooimanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

SGS Achmea 2021381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEarly-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) frequently requires iatrogenic preterm delivery to prevent stillbirth or the sequelae of hypoxia. A prediction model for adverse perinatal outcome could aid clinical decision-making and parental counseling. However, an adequate externally validated model, including predictors that are readily available for this purpose, is currently lacking. The aim of the present study was to develop a prediction model for composite adverse perinatal outcome (CAPO) to be used at the time of hospital admission for fetal monitoring in early-onset FGR.

methodsA model was developed to predict CAPOs (defined as one or more of the following: perinatal or in-hospital mortality, necrotizing enterocolitis ≥ Stage IIA, moderate or severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia, cystic periventricular leukomalacia, intraventricular hemorrhage ≥ Grade III or venous infarction and/or culture-proven sepsis) in early-onset FGR. The model was developed and internally validated in the OPTICORE study, a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of pregnancies complicated by early-onset FGR, in accordance with the consensus-based definition, in six academic hospitals in The Netherlands. Candidate predictors were selected based on the existing literature and expert opinion and comprised maternal medical history, obstetric history, fetal growth and Doppler assessment. A backward stepwise elimination procedure was performed based on the Aikake Information Criterion. Internal validation was performed by bootstrapping and repeating the predictor selection process to determine the shrinkage factor to adjust for overfitting. Internal-external cross-validation was performed as a sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of clustering of patients within each hospital.

resultsIn total, 560/1453 (38.5%) pregnancies were complicated by CAPO. The developed model included 14 predicting variables, determined at the time of hospital admission for fetal monitoring: maternal history of chronic kidney disease or chronic hypertension, smoker, previous pregnancy complicated by FGR, gestational age at admission, fetal sex, concomitant pre-eclampsia, the use of magnesium sulfate, gestational diabetes mellitus, estimated fetal weight, umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index percentile, absent or reversed end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery and gestational age at diagnosis of FGR. After internal validation and shrinkage to adjust for optimism, the model performed well (area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79-0.87); calibration slope, 1.05 (95% CI, 0.94-1.17); calibration-in-the-large, 0.07 (95% CI, -0.06 to 0.20)). The internal-external cross-validation sensitivity analysis revealed equivalent model performance measures across the three largest hospitals.

conclusionsThe developed model, including 14 readily available predictors, showed good performance for the prediction of CAPO at the time of hospital admission and may serve as a helpful tool for clinical decision-making and parental counseling in the setting of early-onset FGR. External validation and assessment of the model's impact on clinical decision-making and patient outcomes are required before it can be implemented in routine clinical practice. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

Fetal Growth RetardationAdultFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMiddle Cerebral ArteryNetherlandsPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentUltrasonography, PrenatalUmbilical Arteriesadverse perinatal outcomeclinical decision‐makingearly‐onset fetal growth restrictionparental counselingprediction model

Identifiers

PMID40623699
PMCPMC12317299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.