ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2025
Joint modeling of mixed outcomes using a rank-based sparse neural network.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn the past few decades, high-throughput profiling has been extensively conducted, leading to significant advancements in cancer research, survival analysis, and other biomedical studies. While many methods have been developed to identify important features and construct predictive models, biomedical research often faces challenges due to insufficient information caused by high dimensionality and small sample sizes, which frequently lead to unsatisfactory identification and prediction accuracy.
methodsIn this paper, we propose a rank-based sparse neural network that efficiently leverages information from mixed outcomes, particularly incorporating survival data. The proposed method accounts for unknown relationships between outcomes and high-dimensional covariates, whereas many traditional methods are built on a parametric framework. A novel loss function is derived to address the gradient imbalance issue and accommodate mixed outcomes. A sparse layer is developed to implement the penalization method, enabling the identification of important variables.
resultsWe conducted extensive simulation studies, showing that the proposed method is effective and broadly applicable. The analysis of skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) demonstrates the competitive performance of our proposed method.
conclusionThe proposed method effectively models mixed outcomes (including survival data) and selects important features, which is beneficial for biomedical studies like cancer and genomic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.