ReviewAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2025
Sensitization in Transplantation Assessment of Risk 2025 innate working group: The potential role of innate allorecognition in kidney allograft damage.
Review in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tailoring HLA antibody monitoring post-transplantation.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- Autoreactive antibody production by intrarenal B cells in mouse kidney allograft rejection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Rejection-Focused Precision Medicine in Kidney Transplantation: Biology, Biomarkers, and Artificial Intelligence.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Innovative approaches targeting innate immune cells to promote organ transplant tolerance.Frontiers in transplantation · 2026Review
- The Top 12 Most Impactful Papers in Clinical Transplantation in 2025: TI Editors' Choice.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In solid organ transplantation, the alloimmune response is traditionally attributed to the action of alloreactive T cells that recognize mismatched human leukocyte antigens, as well as antibody formation and antibody-mediated rejection. However, recent evidence indicates that these paradigms of involvement of the adaptive immune system in organ transplant rejection do not explain all cases of graft inflammation and that innate cell allorecognition plays a role. This review, conducted by the innate team of the Sensitization in Transplantation Assessment of Risk workgroup, summarizes the concepts and empirical evidence supporting innate allorecognition. The focus is on natural killer cell activation via missing self and monocyte activation through the signal regulatory protein α-CD47 pathway and SIRPα gene polymorphisms. A consensus definition of genetic missing self is proposed, necessitating both donor and recipient human leukocyte antigen class I genotyping and evaluation of the recipient inhibitory killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor genotype. Although in vitro studies and preclinical validations corroborate the potential of innate allorecognition concepts, further research is required to establish clinical utility. This article delineated future research directions to bridge the gap between theoretical promise and practical application in clinical transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.