Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40623327›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025

Posterior column osteotomy for spinal realignment in patients with prior lumbar fusion: illustrative case.

Barnabas Obeng-Gyasi, Anoop Chinthala, Michael J Visconti, Ahmed M Belal, Gordon Mao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Barnabas Obeng-GyasiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0003-3346-1631
Anoop ChinthalaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Michael J ViscontiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Ahmed M BelalDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Gordon MaoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIatrogenic flat back syndrome following prior posterolateral fusion without interbody support is challenging, especially with adjacent segment stenosis. While pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) offers strong correction, it is associated with higher morbidity. Alternative techniques with reduced risk are needed. OBSERVATIONS: The authors present the case of a 71-year-old woman with a 25-year-old L4-S1 fusion and severe sagittal deformity who underwent a Schwab grade 2 posterior column osteotomy (PCO) through the L4-5 fusion mass, with insertion of interbody cages of varying heights and lordotic angles. Preoperative parameters included C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) +10 cm, pelvic incidence (PI) 65°, lumbar lordosis (LL) -13°, PI-LL mismatch 79°, and pelvic tilt (PT) 43°. Postoperative improvements were C7 SVA +5.7 cm, LL 41°, PI-LL mismatch 24°, and PT 35°. The 285-minute surgery had an estimated blood loss of 1100 mL. At 1 month, the patient could walk a one-quarter mile, compared with < 50 feet before surgery. LESSONS: This modified PCO technique provides effective decompression and substantial sagittal correction for iatrogenic flat back syndrome while potentially reducing morbidity compared with PSO. By distributing correction across multiple levels, this approach offers a valuable alternative for patients with moderate to severe sagittal imbalance and concurrent stenosis above prior fusion constructs-avoiding a three-column osteotomy. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25251.

Indexed as

flat back syndromeposterior column osteotomyrevision surgeryTLIF

Identifiers

PMID40623327
PMCPMC12232447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.