Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40623288›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2026

State Medigap Policies and Disenrollment From Medicare Advantage Among Beneficiaries With Cancer.

Brendon Lee, David Pittman, Stacy Cooper, Ravi Gupta, Gerard F Anderson, Angela Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brendon LeeJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0009-0001-3413-1776
David PittmanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0009-0006-8693-0955
Stacy CooperDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Ravi GuptaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0001-5902-6414
Gerard F AndersonDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Angela LiuDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMedicare Advantage (MA) beneficiaries newly diagnosed with cancer may want to switch from MA into traditional Medicare and purchase supplemental insurance (Medigap), which provides important financial protections. However, beneficiaries in states without Medigap consumer protections may be denied or effectively denied (through high premiums) Medigap, potentially trapping them in MA. This study examined whether MA beneficiaries with newly diagnosed cancer were more likely to switch into traditional Medicare in states with stronger Medigap consumer protections.

methodsThis retrospective study analyzed Medicare encounter data for beneficiaries age 65 years and older, continuously enrolled in MA from 2018 to 2019, and received a new cancer diagnosis in 2019. The primary exposure was state-level Medigap protections: no protections, community rating only (some protections), or both community rating and guaranteed issue (strongest protections). The outcome of interest was beneficiary-level disenrollment from MA into traditional Medicare in 2020.

resultsAmong 426,248 MA beneficiaries newly diagnosed with cancer, 2.1% switched into traditional Medicare in states with both community rating and guaranteed issue, 1.1% switched in states with community rating only, and 0.8% switched in states with no Medigap protections. The odds of disenrollment were higher in states with both community rating and guaranteed issue (odds ratio [OR], 2.73 [95% CI, 2.53 to 2.94];

conclusionMA beneficiaries with newly diagnosed cancers had higher rates of disenrollment from MA into traditional Medicare when state-level Medigap consumer protections were present. Beneficiaries appear more likely to switch if states make it financially easier to obtain Medigap.

Indexed as

Insurance, MedigapMedicare Part CNeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40623288
PMCPMC13086114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.