Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40623178›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

The evolution of male-female dominance relations in primate societies.

Elise Huchard, Peter M Kappeler, Nikolaos Smit, Claudia Fichtel, Dieter Lukas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Female Affiliation and Status in Semi-Free-Ranging Chimpanzees.American journal of biological anthropology · 2026
    Article
  4. The evolution of male-female dominance relations in primate societies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elise Huchard *Anthropologie Evolutive, Institut des Sciences de L'Evolution de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier 34095, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6944-449X
Peter M Kappeler *Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Unit, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen 37077, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4801-487X
Nikolaos SmitAnthropologie Evolutive, Institut des Sciences de L'Evolution de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier 34095, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0440-1998
Claudia FichtelBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Unit, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen 37077, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8346-2168
Dieter LukasDepartment of Human Behavior, Ecology and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig 04103, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7141-3545

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) ANR-22-CE92-0030-01Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 505297756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, it was widely assumed that males dominate females socially in most mammals. However, recent studies revealed significant variation within and among species, opening new possibilities to explore the extent and drivers of sex biases in dominance relations. This study uses quantitative data from 253 populations across 121 primate species to investigate the distribution of, and factors associated with, sex biases in the outcome of male-female contests. We first showed that male-female contests are common (around half of all contests) and that males win >90% of these contests in less than 20% of populations. We next tested five hypotheses to explain sex biases in dominance relations. We found that female-biased dominance primarily occurs in primate societies where females have substantial reproductive control, as in monogamous, sexually monomorphic, and arboreal species. Female-biased dominance is also frequent in societies where female-female competition is intense, as in solitary or pair-living species where females are intolerant of each other, as well as in species where females face lower reproductive costs and are philopatric. Conversely, male-biased dominance is common in polygynous, dimorphic, terrestrial, and group-living species and often relies on physical superiority. In contrast, female empowerment hinges on alternative strategies, such as leveraging reproductive control. Our study highlights that male-female dominance relationships are highly variable and identifies the traits associated with the emergence of female- versus male-biased dominance in primate evolutionary history, which may also deepen our understanding of the origins of gender roles in early human societies.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPrimatesSexual Behavior, AnimalSocial DominanceAnimalsFemaleMaleprimatologysexual conflictsocial hierarchy

Identifiers

PMID40623178
PMCPMC12280975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.