ArticlePLoS biology2025
Layers of the monkey visual cortex are selectively modulated during electrical stimulation.
Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Histologically Informed Multiscale Modeling of the Neuronal Elements Activated by TMS.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Traveling-wave transcranial alternating current stimulation (twtACS) causally links neural timing to cognitive function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Simulation of evoked responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation using a multiscale cortical circuit model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Layer-specific electric fields and effective conductivity in nonhuman primates during transcranial electrical stimulation.Brain stimulationArticle
- Simulation of evoked responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation using a multiscale cortical circuit model.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mammalian neocortex, organized into six cellular layers or laminae, forms a cortical network within layers. Layer-specific computations are crucial for sensory processing of visual stimuli within the primary visual cortex. Laminar recordings of local field potentials (LFPs) are a powerful tool to study neural activity within cortical layers. Electric brain stimulation is widely used in basic neuroscience and in a large range of clinical applications. However, the layer-specific effects of electric stimulation on LFPs remain unclear. To address this gap, we recorded laminar LFP from capuchin monkeys' primary visual cortex while presenting a flash visual stimulus. Simultaneously, we applied a low-frequency sinusoidal current to the occipital lobe with an offset frequency to the flash stimulus repetition rate. We analyzed the modulation of visual-evoked potentials with respect to the phase of applied electric stimulation. Our results reveal that only the deeper layers, but not the superficial layers, show phase-dependent changes in LFP components with respect to the applied current. Employing a cortical column model, we show that these in vivo observations can be explained by phase-dependent changes in the driving force within neurons of deeper layers. Our findings offer crucial insight into the selective modulation of cortical layers through electrical stimulation, thus advancing approaches for more targeted neuromodulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.