ArticlePloS one2025
Comparative study on eating habits and health of single-person and multi-person households.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable AI for Digital Health: Predicting Depression Risk in Older Adults Living Alone Using Machine Learning.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dietary diversity trajectories and depression symptoms among rural older adults: a latent class growth analysis and network analysis based on the China longitudinal health and longevity study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Household Composition May Modify the Association Between Home Cooking and Dietary Diversity Among Japanese Corporate Employees.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Adherence to Healthy Dietary Patterns and Cognitive Performance: Evidence from DASH and Mediterranean Diets.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Living Alone as a Persistent Risk Factor for Smoking and High-Risk Drinking: A Three-Year Repeated Cross-Sectional Analysis Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Republic of Korea.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparison of dietary behaviors and nutrient intake by gender and household type among older Koreans: a cross-sectional study using data from the 8th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Korean journal of community nutrition · 2026Article
- Socio-Demographic Correlates of Basic Food Needs: A Maslow's Hierarchy Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the differences in health, dietary habits, and quality of life between single-person and multi-person households, with a specific focus on demographic subgroups such as gender and age. Data were drawn from the 2013-2021 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, encompassing 40,839 participants aged 19 and older, and were analyzed using multivariate regression models. The results revealed significant disparities between the two types of households. Single-person male households exhibited poorer dietary quality and higher metabolic risk indicators, such as elevated waist circumference, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and blood pressure, compared to their multi-person counterparts. In contrast, single-person female households demonstrated slightly better metabolic profiles, including lower body mass index, triglycerides, and fasting glucose, relative to multi-person households. Quality of life, assessed using the EuroQol-5 Dimension, was significantly lower in single-person households, with women reporting higher rates of anxiety, depression, and mobility issues. Subgroup analyses identified pronounced vulnerabilities among single-person males aged 40-59 and single-person females aged 60 and older. These findings highlight the need for tailored public health policies and market strategies to address the distinct needs of diverse single-person household subgroups. Further research should prioritize well-designed studies exploring populations with unique characteristics, such as single-person households, to better understand their specific challenges and requirements compared to multi-person households.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.