ArticlePloS one2025
Enhanced uncertainty sampling with category information for improved active learning.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional uncertainty sampling methods in active learning often neglect category information, leading to imbalanced sample selection in multi-class computer vision tasks. Our approach integrates category information with uncertainty sampling through a novel active learning framework to address this limitation. Our method employs a pre-trained VGG16 architecture and cosine similarity metrics to efficiently extract category features without requiring additional model training. The framework combines these features with traditional uncertainty measures to ensure balanced sampling across classes while maintaining computational efficiency. Extensive experiments across both object detection and image classification tasks validate our method's effectiveness. For object detection, our approach achieves competitive mAP scores while ensuring balanced category representation. For image classification, our method achieves accuracy comparable to state-of-the-art approaches while reducing computational overhead by up to 80%. The results validate our approach's ability to balance sampling efficiency with dataset representativeness across different computer vision tasks. This work offers a practical, efficient solution for large-scale data annotation in domains with limited labeled data and diverse class distributions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.