ArticlePloS one2025
Impact of self-directed learning strategy, an innovative method in nursing undergraduates: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing perceived clinical competence of nursing students in the AI era: the role of AI acceptance and self-directed learning.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Influence of self-efficacy and self-directed learning competence on core competence among nurses specializing in infectious diseases: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn today's fast-paced healthcare environment, self-directed learning is essential for healthcare professionals to stay updated and provide optimal care. Game based learning has a potential of motivating students' engagement and creating fascinating self-directed learning environment for favorable outcome. This randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the impact of game-based learning as an innovative self-directed learning strategy compared to conventional self-directed learning strategy on knowledge acquisition, and self-directed learning abilities among nursing undergraduates based on Self-directed learning Instrument (SDLI) score.
methodsThis quantitative, randomized controlled trial will enroll and randomize 140 undergraduate nursing students in the experimental and control group using stratified random sampling and follow them for 12 weeks. Self-directed learning (SDL) orientation session will be conducted prior to the randomization for all the participants. After randomization, experimental group will undergo SDL with game-based learning and control group will undergo SDL with conventional learning for four weeks. Follow up sessions will be conducted once a week for a period of 4 weeks. Evaluation of impact of intervention will be assessed at four time points: preintervention, immediately postintervention, 4 weeks postintervention and 12 weeks postintervention using structured knowledge questionnaire, Self-Directed Learning Instrument (SDLI) and Cognitive, Affective and Psychomotor (CAP) perceived learning scale. ANOVA will be used to compare the variations in self-directed learning ability, perceived learning competency, and knowledge between two groups. Regression analysis will be conducted to explore the correlation between various independent variables and the dependent variables. Paired t-test will be used to analyze the variation between pre-test and post-test results, considering a p-value less than 0.05 to be statistically significant. DISCUSSION: This trial aims to determine whether game-based learning as an innovative self -directed learning strategy is superior to conventional self-directed learning strategy in improving knowledge level and self-directed learning abilities of nursing undergraduates. This trial is approved by the Datta Megha Institute of Higher Education & Research, Institutional ethics committee (DMIHER(DU)/IEC/2023/141C). We plan to disseminate study results in peer-reviewed journals and international conferences.
trial registrationTrial Registered Prospectively [CTRI/2024/01/061599].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.