Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40622986›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The role of individual recognition in shaping empathy and trust toward an agent.

Takahiro Tsumura, Seiji Yamada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Takahiro TsumuraFaculty of Information Networking for Innovation and Design, Toyo University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3145-3120
Seiji YamadaNational Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5907-7382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When individuals receive assistance, the principle of reciprocity is often triggered. In social contexts, whether the actors are humans or AI/robots (hereafter referred to as agents), multiple individuals may engage in the same task. However, differences in capabilities can lead to varying levels of performance. This study investigated whether individuals improve greater empathy and trust toward an agent that provides assistance during a collaborative task, even when multiple agents are involved. Specifically, we examined a scenario in which one agent completes the remaining portion of a shared typing task under time constraints, acting on behalf of the others. To assess whether participants could distinguish between agents, we manipulated visual identity using color-coded agents. Data collected from 392 participants indicated that while people did not strongly differentiate between individual agents based on visual cues alone, supportive behavior by a single agent significantly enhanced trust and empathy. Interestingly, these positive impressions extended to visually similar, non-helping agents. These findings suggest that the presence of a helpful agent can promote broader acceptance and positive evaluation of agents in general, which may be beneficial for integrating agents into increasingly agent-assisted societies.

Indexed as

EmpathyRecognition, PsychologyTrustAdolescentAdultCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40622986
PMCPMC12233285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.