ArticlePloS one2025
The role of individual recognition in shaping empathy and trust toward an agent.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of knowledge and importance on responsibility in human-AI decision making.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When individuals receive assistance, the principle of reciprocity is often triggered. In social contexts, whether the actors are humans or AI/robots (hereafter referred to as agents), multiple individuals may engage in the same task. However, differences in capabilities can lead to varying levels of performance. This study investigated whether individuals improve greater empathy and trust toward an agent that provides assistance during a collaborative task, even when multiple agents are involved. Specifically, we examined a scenario in which one agent completes the remaining portion of a shared typing task under time constraints, acting on behalf of the others. To assess whether participants could distinguish between agents, we manipulated visual identity using color-coded agents. Data collected from 392 participants indicated that while people did not strongly differentiate between individual agents based on visual cues alone, supportive behavior by a single agent significantly enhanced trust and empathy. Interestingly, these positive impressions extended to visually similar, non-helping agents. These findings suggest that the presence of a helpful agent can promote broader acceptance and positive evaluation of agents in general, which may be beneficial for integrating agents into increasingly agent-assisted societies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.