Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40622954›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Virtual reality as a strategy for intra-operatory anxiolysis and pharmacological sparing in patients undergoing breast surgeries: The V-RAPS randomized controlled trial protocol.

Joe Zako, Nicolas Daccache, Julien Burey, Ariane Clairoux, Louis Morisson, Pascal Laferrière-Langlois

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06522711 (Virtual Reality as a Strategy for Intra-operatory Anxiolysis and Pharmacological Sparing in Patients Undergoing Breast Surgeries), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06522711 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Virtual Reality as a Strategy for Intra-operatory Anxiolysis and Pharmacological Sparing in Patients Undergoing Breast Surgeries : the V-RAPS Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCiusss de L'Est de l'Île de MontréalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsVirtual Reality, PropofolArmsVirtual reality headset, Standard of care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joe ZakoMaisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6009-3540
Nicolas DaccacheMaisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Julien BureyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Services Sociaux de l'Est de L'Île de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Ariane ClairouxDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Services Sociaux de l'Est de L'Île de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Louis MorissonMaisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Pascal Laferrière-LangloisMaisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3347-1581

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVirtual reality (VR) has increasingly found applications beyond leisure and video games, extending into the field of medicine. Recent studies indicate that VR can effectively reduce anxiety and pain in pediatric patients undergoing uncomfortable medical procedures, such as burn wound care. Yet, VR use in the operating room is still rare, despite a growing trend toward regional anesthesia without general anesthesia; physicians still frequently rely on pharmacological sedation to manage procedural anxiety. By leveraging VR's anxiolytic properties, it may be possible to decrease the need for intravenous (IV) sedation which is associated with risk of adverse events like apnea and hypoxemia and delayed recovery.

objectivesThis study's main objective is to determine the impact of VR on IV sedation requirements in adult patients undergoing breast surgery under paravertebral (PV) block without general anesthesia. We will be using Paperplane Therapeutics' VR headset and software which offer three distinct VR scenario choices. We hypothesize that VR immersion will reduce the need for intraoperative pharmacological sedation. Secondary objectives include assessing the tolerance of patients to the VR headset, examining the impact of the chosen VR scenario on the primary outcome, evaluating the incidence of adverse effects, measuring patient satisfaction, and analyzing the output of the Nociception Level (NOL) Index among awake surgical patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis single center randomized controlled trial will enroll 100 patients aged 18 or above undergoing breast surgery under PV block. Participants will be randomly allocated to the VR group or the control group; both will have access to pharmacological sedation through patient-controlled sedation (PCS). Participants in the VR group will choose between three different VR scenarios and will be allowed to switch between these scenarios during surgery. The primary outcome will be the time-adjusted and weight adjusted dose of self-administered intraoperative propofol. Secondary outcomes will include patient satisfaction, adverse events, and post-anesthesia care unit length of stay (PACU LOS). ETHICS: This trial has been approved by the regional ethics committee (Comité d'Éthique de la Recherche du CIUSSS de l'Est de l'Île de Montréal) on September 9th, 2024.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (July 25th, 2024). Unique protocol ID: 2025-3802. Trial identification number: NCT06522711.

Indexed as

AnxietyBreastVirtual RealityAdultFemaleHumansPatient SatisfactionRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID40622954
PMCPMC12233254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.