ArticlePloS one2025
Saliency-enhanced infrared and visible image fusion via sub-window variance filter and weighted least squares optimization.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel method for infrared and visible image fusion (IVIF) to address the limitations of existing techniques in enhancing salient features and improving visual clarity. The method employs a sub-window variance filter (SVF) based decomposition technique to separate salient features and texture details into distinct band layers. A saliency map measurement scheme based on weighted least squares optimization (WLSO) is then designed to compute weight maps, enhancing the visibility of important features. Finally, pixel-level summation is used for feature map reconstruction, producing high-quality fused images. Experiments on three public datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms nine state-of-the-art fusion techniques in both qualitative and quantitative evaluations, particularly in salient target highlighting and texture detail preservation. Unlike deep learning-based approaches, our method does not require large-scale training datasets, reducing dependence on ground truth and avoiding fused image distortion. Limitations include potential challenges in handling highly complex scenes, which will be addressed in future work by exploring adaptive parameter optimization and integration with deep learning frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.