Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40622909›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2025

Safety of outpatient non-upper airway surgery for patients with obstructive sleep apnea in ambulatory surgical centers: A systematic review.

Muaaz Asghar, Kenny Pang, Mauz Asghar, Brian Rotenberg

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muaaz AsgharCollege of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0427-5289
Kenny PangAsia Sleep Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Mauz AsgharCollege of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Brian RotenbergDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe systematic review aims to determine the safety of conducting non-upper airway surgery in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) for OSA patients. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search was conducted from MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Scopus from inception through February 2023. REVIEW

methodsStudies including non-upper airway surgery done in ASC settings were identified. Risk of bias was assessed using the Murad Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Primary outcomes were 24 hour complications and unplanned admission rates.

resultsFrom 9313 studies, 13 non-OSA studies with 31,200 OSA participants and 318,709 non-OSA participants were identified. Severe complications were rare and tended to occur within the first 4 hours of the postoperative period. While a majority of smaller scale studies found no significant difference in unplanned admissions, large scale studies with multivariate analysis find OSA to be an independent risk factor for unplanned admission and 30-day complications. However, large scale ASC studies have found that with proper selection and perioperative interventions, OSA patients can undergo outpatient surgery at ASCs safely.

conclusionsOSA patients with mild or controlled comorbidities can safely undergo ambulatory non-OSA surgery in ASCs. OTHER: The protocol for this review was registered with the PROSPERO database (Registration number: CRD42023415162).

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresSleep Apnea, ObstructiveHumansOutpatientsPostoperative ComplicationsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID40622909
PMCPMC12233240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.