Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40622858›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesiology2025

Effects of Increased Cardiopulmonary Bypass Pump Flow on Renal Filtration, Perfusion, Oxygenation, and Tubular Injury in Cardiac Surgical Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Johanna Wijk, Anna Cordefeldt-Keiller, Gudrun Bragadottir, Bengt Redfors, Sven-Erik Ricksten, Lukas Lannemyr

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johanna WijkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg and Section of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0000-2069-9996
Anna Cordefeldt-KeillerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg and Section of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Gudrun BragadottirDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg and Section of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Bengt RedforsDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg and Section of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sven-Erik RickstenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg and Section of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lukas LannemyrDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg and Section of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8280-5210

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with impaired renal oxygenation and acute kidney injury. The authors investigated whether an amount higher than their standard blood flow during CPB could improve renal blood flow, the oxygen demand-supply relationship, and function and attenuate tubular injury.

methodsAfter ethical approval and informed consent, 36 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery received either high flow (2.9 l · min -1 · m -2 , n = 19) or standard flow (2.4 l · min -1 · m -2 , n = 17) during CPB in this randomized, nonblinded, parallell-arm study. Systemic hemodynamics and renal variables were measured before and during CPB. Glomerular filtration rate was measured by infusion clearance of iohexol and renal blood flow by infusion clearance of para-aminohippuric acid, corrected for renal extraction of para-aminohippuric acid, using a renal vein catheter. Renal oxygen demand-supply relationship was estimated from renal oxygen extraction and tubular injury assessed by urinary N -acetyl-β- d -glucosaminidase.

resultsDuring CPB, high flow led to a larger increase in systemic oxygen delivery (100 [95% CI, 60 to 141] vs. 31 [1.9 to 65] ml · min -1 · m -2 ]; between-group P < 0.001; effect size Cohen's dz , 0.59) and target mean arterial pressure was maintained at a lower norepinephrine dose (0.03 [-0.01 to 0.06] µg · kg -1 · min -1 ] vs. 0.10 [0.02 to 0.19] µg · kg -1 · min -1 ; P = 0.048; Cohen's dz , 0.62) compared with standard flow. There were no differences in renal blood flow or oxygen extraction between groups. Glomerular filtration rate increased during high-flow CPB (6.4 [1.9 to 10.9] ml · min -1 · 1.73 m -2 ), but not in the standard-flow group (-2.3 [-10.9 to 6.2] ml · min -1 · 1.73 m -2 ; between-group P = 0.044; Cohen's dz , 0.66). The peak urinary excretion of N -acetyl-β- d -glucosaminidase was 1.42 (0.87 to 3.6) versus 3.74 (1.5 to 7.7) units/µmol creatinine in the high-flow and standard-flow groups, respectively ( P = 0.049). No perfusion-related adverse events were seen in either group.

conclusionsA 20% higher-than-standard CPB flow during cardiac surgery improved renal function, whereas no change in renal blood flow or oxygen demand-supply relationship could be detected. Higher CPB flow was associated with a less pronounced tubular injury marker release compared with standard flow.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryCardiac Surgical ProceduresCardiopulmonary BypassGlomerular Filtration RateKidney TubulesOxygenOxygen ConsumptionRenal CirculationAgedFemaleHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedOxygen

Identifiers

PMID40622858
PMCPMC12416890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.