ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine
Exploring the Importance of Repeated Health Screening in Healthy Older Dogs.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical relevance of repeated health screenings in aging dogs remains unclear. Moreover, which physical or laboratory variables are associated with survival have not been thoroughly studied.
objectivesEvaluate the health status of apparently healthy older dogs and determine which diseases are manifested in confirmed healthy dogs within 2 years, based on extensive health screening. Assess the predictive value for mortality of various clinicopathological variables at baseline in confirmed healthy older dogs. ANIMALS: A total of 122 apparently healthy senior and geriatric dogs.
methodsProspective, longitudinal study. History, physical examination, blood testing, and urinalysis were performed at baseline and every 12 months for 2 years.
resultsAt baseline, 20% of apparently healthy older dogs were diagnosed with ≥ 1 disease, resulting in 98 confirmed healthy dogs included in the follow-up study. The most common emerging disorders within 2 years were neoplasia (cumulative incidence, 12%), azotemic chronic kidney disease (CKD, 8%), neurologic disease (11%), or orthopedic disorders (5%). Malignant neoplasia could be detected in 47% (8/17) of dogs on physical examination, including rectal, skin, and mammary gland palpation. Only age group was associated with survival in confirmed healthy dogs at baseline, with geriatric dogs being more likely to die compared with senior dogs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Routine health screening helps to detect unrecognized diseases in older dogs. Repeated screening for CKD, rectal palpation, and assessment of neurologic and orthopedic health seem most relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.