Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40622738›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2025

Potential Time and Recall Benefits for Adaptive AI-Based Breast Cancer MRI Screening.

Luuk Balkenende, Jonatan Ferm, Vivien van Veldhuizen, Joren Brunekreef, Jonas Teuwen, Ritse M Mann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luuk BalkenendeDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0526-1573
Jonatan FermDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Vivien van VeldhuizenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Joren BrunekreefDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jonas TeuwenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Ritse M MannDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8111-1930

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding 13591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbbreviated breast MRI protocols are advocated for breast screening as they limit acquisition duration and increase resource availability. However, radiologists' specificity may be slightly lowered when only such short protocols are evaluated. An adaptive approach, where a full protocol is performed only when abnormalities are detected by artificial intelligence (AI)-based models in the abbreviated protocol, might improve and speed up MRI screening. This study explores the potential benefits of such an approach. PURPOSE: To assess the potential impact of adaptive breast MRI scanning based on AI detection of malignancies. STUDY TYPE: Mathematical model. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Breast cancer screening protocols. ASSESSMENT: Theoretical upper and lower limits on expected protocol duration and recall rate were determined for the adaptive approach, and the influence of the AI model and radiologists' performance metrics on these limits was assessed, under the assumption that any finding on the abbreviated protocol would, in an ideal follow-up scenario, prompt a second MRI with the full protocol. STATISTICAL TESTS: Estimated most likely scenario.

resultsTheoretical limits for the proposed adaptive AI-based MRI breast cancer screening showed that the recall rates of the abbreviated and full screening protocols always constrained the recall rate. These abbreviated and full protocols did not fully constrain the expected protocol duration, and an adaptive protocol's expected duration could thus be shorter than the abbreviated protocol duration. Specificity, either from AI models or radiologists, has the largest effect on the theoretical limits. In the most likely scenario, the adaptive protocol achieved an expected protocol duration reduction of ~47%-60% compared with the full protocol. DATA

conclusionThe proposed adaptive approach may offer a reduction in expected protocol duration compared with the use of the full protocol alone, and a lower recall rate relative to an abbreviated-only approach could be achieved. Optimal performance was observed when AI models emulated radiologists' decision-making behavior, rather than focusing solely on near-perfect malignancy detection. EVIDENCE LEVEL: Not applicable. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 6.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsBreastFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedModels, TheoreticalReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTime Factorsartificial intelligencebreast cancer screeningexpected protocol durationrecall ratescreening protocoltheoretical limits

Identifiers

PMID40622738
PMCPMC12435120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.