Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40622712›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Firearm Storage and Firearm Suicide.

Matthew Miller, Joeseph Wertz, Sonja A Swanson, Joseph A Simonetti, Yifan Zhang, Deborah R Azrael

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew MillerDepartment of Public Health and Health Sciences, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Joeseph WertzDepartment of Surgery, University of California, Irvine.
Sonja A SwansonDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Joseph A SimonettiFirearm Injury Prevention Initiative, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora.
Yifan ZhangDepartment of Health Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Deborah R AzraelDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard Injury Control Research Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Suicide-prevention interventions often recommend removing firearms from the homes of individuals at elevated risk of suicide or, short of removal, locking and unloading all household firearms. The recommendation to remove firearms is based on strong and consistent evidence. For adults, however, the recommendation to lock firearms is based on few studies with inconsistent findings. Objective: To assess the association between firearm storage practices and suicide method by sex and age. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study investigated decedents aged 15 years or older who lived in a home with firearms in the last year of their life and who died by suicide. Data were from the 1993 National Mortality Followback Survey. Analyses were conducted from June 1, 2024, to March 30, 2025. Exposures: The presence of 1 or more unlocked firearm in the decedent's residence and/or 1 or more loaded firearm. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was firearm storage practices by suicide method. Logistic models, including both exposures, compared the relative odds of exposure among decedents who died by firearm suicide vs nonfirearm suicide, adjusted for sex, age, and region of residence at the time of death. Results: Among the 725 individuals who died by suicide (mean [SD] age, 47.1 [19.7] years; 554 males [85.0%]), 606 (83.6%) decedents died by firearm suicide and 119 (16.4%) died by nonfirearm suicide. Adult suicide decedents who used firearms were neither more nor less likely than those who used other suicide methods to have lived in a home where all firearms were locked (odds ratio [OR], 1.15 [95% CI, 0.67-1.95]) or unloaded (OR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.44-1.36]). Corresponding ORs for locked firearms were 1.29 (95% CI, 0.69-2.44) for men and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.24-1.41) for women; for unloaded firearms, ORs were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.41-1.56) for men and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.25-1.51) for women. Among adolescent and young adult (hereinafter adolescent) decedents aged 15 to 20 years, approximately half (26 of 43 [60.5%]) who died by firearm suicide, but none of the 7 who died by nonfirearm suicide, had lived in a home with unlocked firearms. Among adolescents in households in which all firearms were locked, suicide method was not associated with whether any firearm was unloaded (OR, 1.36 [95% CI, 0.10-18.9]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this case-control study, neither locking nor unloading household firearms was associated with whether adults used a firearm in their suicide. By contrast, adolescents who died by firearm suicide were far more likely to have lived in a household with unlocked firearms than were adolescent decedents who died by nonfirearm suicide methods. Suicide-prevention approaches that aim to reduce suicide mortality, especially for adult subpopulations likely to own firearms, should focus on firearm access rather than storage practices.

Indexed as

FirearmsSuicideAdolescentAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40622712
PMCPMC12235496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.