Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40622673›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and therapy2025

Patient Profile and Outcomes Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Baricitinib Versus Other Therapies in Spain: The RA-BE-REAL Study.

Mª Luz García-Vivar, Águeda Prior-Español, Walid Fakhouri, Silvia Díaz-Cerezo, Itxaso Aguirregabiria, Sebastián Moyano, Amelia Cobo, Samuel Ogwu, Pilar Trenor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mª Luz García-VivarReumatology Department, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain.
Águeda Prior-EspañolReumatology Department, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Walid FakhouriEli Lilly and Company, Bracknell, UK.
Silvia Díaz-CerezoEli Lilly and Company, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain.
Itxaso AguirregabiriaEli Lilly and Company, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain. itxasoedurne.aguirregabiria@lilly.com.
Sebastián MoyanoEli Lilly and Company, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain.
Amelia CoboEli Lilly and Company, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain.
Samuel OgwuEli Lilly and Company, Cork, Ireland.
Pilar TrenorReumathology Department, Valencia Clinic Hospital, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by joint inflammation and pain. Baricitinib, a targeted JAK inhibitor indicated for moderate to severe RA, has shown efficacy and safety, but real-world data on effectiveness and discontinuation rates are limited. This study aimed to report time to discontinuation, effectiveness, and patient-reported outcomes in patients initiating baricitinib or other biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD) in the Spanish clinical practice.

methodsThe subgroup from 11 Spanish hospitals in the multinational prospective RA-BE-REAL study was analysed. Patients treated for the first time with baricitinib or other b/tsDMARD were included. The primary objective was time to all-cause discontinuation of treatment at 24 months. Secondary objectives included assessing baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and effectiveness on disease activity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and pain. Statistical analyses were descriptive in nature.

resultsEighty patients initiating baricitinib (cohort A, n = 31) or any b/tsDMARD (cohort B, n = 49) were included. Most patients were women, with mean age 62.6 and 57.0 years, respectively; 58.1% in cohort A and 40.8% in cohort B had prior b/tsDMARD treatment. After 24 months, 61.3% and 44.9% continued their initial treatment, respectively. Main reason for discontinuation was secondary loss of response (19.4% and 26.5%, respectively). After 3 months, both cohorts showed improvements in disease activity, swollen and tender joint counts, physician and patient global assessments, disability, pain, and HRQoL. This trend to improvement was maintained for up to 24 months, suggesting a rapid and sustained response. At 24 months, 46.4% and 29.3% achieved low disease activity; 10.7% and 26.8% achieved remission, respectively.

conclusionThe study suggests that baricitinib, despite being used in an older and more treatment-experienced cohort, shows comparable effectiveness and a trend towards lower discontinuation rates for up to 24 months, reinforcing its potential as a treatment option.

Indexed as

BaricitinibDiscontinuationEffectivenessPersistenceReal-worldRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID40622673
PMCPMC12450180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.