ArticleDermatology and therapy2025
Therapeutic Burden as Predictor of Response to Baricitinib for Alopecia Areata in Real Life: Prospective Study.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTherapeutic burden (TB) has been proposed as a potential predictor of treatment outcomes in both dermatological and non-dermatological diseases. This study aims to introduce the concept in the context of alopecia areata (AA) and assess its potential value in supporting therapeutic decision-making in clinical practice.
methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted including patients with AA who started treatment with baricitinib between January 2022 and January 2025 at a third-level hospital center. The main variable was TB, defined as the cumulative sum of previous systemic treatment cycles. An analysis was performed on whether socio-demographic or clinical factors were associated with TB.
resultsForty-four patients with AA treated with baricitinib were included. Most were women (65.90%) with a mean age of 37.70 (16.10) years. The predominant type of AA was multi-plaque (65.90%) and approximately one third (34.10%) had total/universal forms of the disease. Lower TB was statistically significantly associated with a greater reduction in Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) scores during the first 12 months of barictinib treatment compared with those patients with high TB (p < 0.05). This association was observed independently of all other known progression factors (duration of AA, baseline SALT, total/universal AA, female sex) (p < 0.05).
conclusionsWe present the concept of AA-adapted TB as a useful tool for categorizing patients with AA and contributing to therapeutic decision-making. Patients with AA with low TB showed a greater response to baricitinib treatment than patients who had received a greater number of systemic treatments previously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.