Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40622648›Full record

ArticleInfection2025

Two novel lytic bacteriophages with antibiofilm activity against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections.

Jinghan Zhang, Xiaoxiao Sun, Ping Zeng, Lianwei Ye, Ning Dong, Zhuangzhuang Gao, Mengtian Jiang, Si-Yue Chen, Cengceng Huang, Wentao Chen and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jinghan ZhangAnhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Enzymology and Mechanism of Major Metabolic Diseases, College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, 241000, China.
Xiaoxiao SunAnhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Enzymology and Mechanism of Major Metabolic Diseases, College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, 241000, China.
Ping ZengSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Lianwei YeDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Science, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.
Ning DongSchool of Public Health, Zhejiang University, Hang Zhou, China.
Zhuangzhuang GaoAnhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Enzymology and Mechanism of Major Metabolic Diseases, College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, 241000, China.
Mengtian JiangAnhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Enzymology and Mechanism of Major Metabolic Diseases, College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, 241000, China.
Si-Yue ChenAnhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Enzymology and Mechanism of Major Metabolic Diseases, College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, 241000, China.
Cengceng HuangAnhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Enzymology and Mechanism of Major Metabolic Diseases, College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, 241000, China.
Wentao ChenAnhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Enzymology and Mechanism of Major Metabolic Diseases, College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, 241000, China.
Peng LuAnhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Enzymology and Mechanism of Major Metabolic Diseases, College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, 241000, China.
Sharon Shui Yee LeungSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Sheng ChenDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Science, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong. sheng.chen@polyu.edu.hk.
Qipeng ChengAnhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Enzymology and Mechanism of Major Metabolic Diseases, College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, 241000, China. qpcheng@ahnu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32202987Outstanding Innovative Research Team for Molecular Enzymology and Detection in Anhui Provincial Universities 2022AH010012the Key Program of Anhui Educational Committee 2022AH050179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) poses a major challenge in clinical settings due to high morbidity, mortality, and limited treatment options. In response, phage therapy has reemerged as a promising alternative to conventional antibiotics. In this study, two lytic bacteriophages, Kpn_PImp2 and Kpn_PImp3, were isolated from urban sewage, a rich source of phages owing to its diverse microbial community. These phages demonstrated remarkable pH stability and thermostability, ensuring their activity under a variety of environmental and physiological conditions. Genomic analysis suggests that both phages likely belong to the Webervirus genus within the Caudoviricetes class, characterized by tailed phages with double-stranded DNA. Importantly, neither phage harbors lysogenic, toxin, nor antimicrobial resistance genes, affirming their safety for therapeutic applications. Comparative studies of tail fiber proteins, which play a crucial role in host specificity, indicate that structural variations may account for the distinct host ranges of Kpn_PImp2 and Kpn_PImp3. Moreover, both phages exhibited the ability to inhibit and disrupt biofilm formation, a key factor in CRKP persistence and resistance. Their biofilm-disrupting properties could potentially enhance the penetration and efficacy of antibiotics in combination therapies. The in vivo efficacy of these phages was further validated using the Galleria mellonella infection model, where treatment led to a significant reduction in larval mortality. However, a cocktail combining both phages did not show synergistic benefits over monophage therapy, likely due to shared host-cell receptors. These findings highlight Kpn_PImp2 and Kpn_PImp3 as promising candidates for phage therapy against CRKP, warranting further research into resistance mechanisms, delivery methods, and combination therapies to fully realize their therapeutic potential. This study also expands the bacteriophage resources against K. pneumoniae and provides valuable insights for phage-based treatments.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesCarbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeKlebsiella InfectionsKlebsiella pneumoniaePhage TherapyAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsCaudoviralesCombined Modality TherapyDisease Models, AnimalGenome, ViralMothsSewageAnti-Bacterial AgentsSewageBacteriophageBiofilmCarbapenem-resistantKlebsiella pneumoniaePhage therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.