ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Gender differences between dyadic coping and emotional distress in young and middle-aged cancer patients and spouses.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceived communication barriers with spouses among young adult patients with cancer and their association with psychological distress.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Dyadic Coping and Its Influencing Factors in Patients With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Their Spouses: A Latent Class Analysis.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Observational
- Relations in young adults with cancer: acknowledging partners and friends as caregivers-a Danish national study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Exploring Psychological Capital, Dyadic Coping, and Ego Depletion in PCOS Patients and Their Spouses: An Actor‒Partner Interdependence Mediation Model.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe aims of this study were to explore the relationships between dyadic coping (DC) and emotional distress (anxiety and depressive symptoms) in young and middle-aged couples dealing with cancer, from the perspective of gender.
methodsThis cross-sectional study comprised 275 couples (aged 20-59) in which one partner had a cancer diagnosis. Couples completed the general information questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Dyadic Coping Inventory. The actor-partner interdependence moderated model was used to analyze the dyad data and the moderating role of patient gender.
resultsNo matter whether for patients or spouses, negative DC positively correlated with anxiety and depression symptoms, positive DC negatively correlated with anxiety and depression symptoms. For anxiety symptoms, patients' gender moderated the actor effect of the pair's negative DC on their anxiety symptoms and the partner effect of the spouse's negative DC on the patient's anxiety symptoms. For depression symptoms, the patient's gender moderated the actor effect of the spouse negative DC on his or her own depressive symptoms. The relationships between negative DC and emotional distress are stronger among female patients and female spouses.
conclusionsThis study reveals that patient gender plays a moderating role between negative DC and emotional distress symptoms. It suggests that relevant interventions should focus on reducing negative DC behaviors of patients and spouses, especially for female patients and spouses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40622628What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.