ReviewForensic toxicology2026
Hair testing for investigating intake and use history of hypnotics in the forensic field.
Review in Forensic toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of segmental hair analysis to elucidate routine and immediately pre-mortem drug intake histories in highly decomposed corpses.Forensic toxicology · 2026Article
- First case of drug-facilitated sexual assault involving metizolam.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHair testing for drugs has been used extensively in the forensic field since the 1990s, primarily in cases involving abused drugs such as methamphetamine and cocaine. Since the 2010s, its scope has expanded to include the detection of single dose of hypnotics, aiding in the investigation of serious crimes. This review presents essential knowledge for hair testing and the currently recommended analytical procedures and forensic applications.
methodsA review of literature from the 1990s to the 2020s was conducted, focusing on analytical methods for detecting drugs in hair, drug concentrations in hair, and drug incorporation pathways.
resultsThe characteristics of hair as a biological specimen include a longer detection window than other matrices such as urine and blood, as ingested drugs remain stable in hair over time. Significant differences in drug concentrations in hair are observed among substances, with several hypnotics, such as triazolam, having extremely low concentrations. Drugs are incorporated into hair primarily through two main pathways (the hair bulb and the upper dermis zone), with the dominant pathway depending on the drug's properties. In addition, hair dyeing and subsequent exposure to aqueous environments (e.g., daily hair washing) can significantly influence drug concentrations and their distribution patterns (concentration and hair region). These factors must be carefully considered in hair testing.
conclusionsHair testing is an effective means for proving drug intake and estimating use history, particularly in cases where there is a delay in reporting the incident. The interpretation of results must account for various factors, such as the chemical structures of drugs, incorporation pathways, and hair dyeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.