ArticleApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2025
Comparison of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Degrading Cutinases from Bacteria and Fungi: Structural Characterization and Molecular Docking Analysis.
Article in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic Degradation of Parabens via Laccase/TEMPO/Cutinase System: Performance and Mechanism.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Integrative frameworks for plastic biodegradation in insect-microbiome systems: mechanistic insights, emerging multi-omics and enzyme engineering perspectives.Biodegradation · 2026Review
- Microbial enzymes for plastic degradation: a comprehensive review of current status and emerging trends.Biodegradation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is one of the major plastics specified in the Plastics Identification System, which has been proven harmful to living organisms. The degradation of PET is made possible by microbial enzymes such as cutinases. Cutinase can be found in both bacteria and fungi, however, the degradation rate might be different. In this study, the known structures of fifteen fungal and bacterial cutinases were investigated using computational analysis. To compare the ability of these cutinases in PET degradation, a molecular docking analysis between the dimer unit of PET monomer (di-PET) and the enzymes was conducted using AutoDock Vina, resulting in predicted binding affinities and molecular interactions. Computational analysis of the enzymes identified a high aliphatic index indicative of high thermal stability. The analyses of the secondary and tertiary structures of cutinases showed their overall high stability and regions of flexibility. According to molecular docking analysis, Thermobifida genus cutinases showed the highest binding affinity for di-PET in comparison to other bacterial species and fungi. In particular, the calcium-bound cutinase Est119 from Thermobifida alba was predicted to bind di-PET with an affinity of - 6.4 kcal/mol at a position close to the Ser-residue of the catalytic triad that is involved in the first step of ester hydrolysis. Furthermore, among fungi, the strongest binding affinities between the cutinases and di-PET were observed in the Fusarium genus and Humicola insolens with - 5.7 kcal/mol. This study indicates the possibilities for further engineering of these enzymes for more efficient PET degradation, industrial recycling and upcycling, and improved waste management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40622556What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.