ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2025
Exploring the Innate Immunity in Invertebrates.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tick threats in the context of climate change: One Health response strategies in the Middle East and North Africa region.Science in One Health · 2026Review
- Oxylipins in Atherosclerosis: Their Role in Inflammation, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Redefinition of the toll-like receptor repertoire inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Innate immunity in invertebrates represents the first line of defense against invading pathogens. The host's response to invading pathogens is a vital physiological reaction across all living organisms, and various defense mechanisms have evolved to preserve cellular integrity, homeostasis, and survival. Invertebrates possess cellular receptors that bind to foreign elements, enabling them to distinguish between self and non-self. In multicellular animals, this function is linked to phagocytes-known by different names like amebocytes, hemocytes, and coelomocytes-in diverse groups of invertebrates. These phagocytes are equipped with pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs) that detect pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), which are conserved across various pathogens such as viruses, bacteria, fungi, protozoans, and helminths. Prominent PRRs include Toll-like receptors (TLRs), Nod-like receptors (NLRs), and scavenger receptors. Upon binding to a pathogen, these receptors trigger a cascade of cellular reactions that lead to the production of effector molecules. Cytokines are crucial in coordinating these responses, even in lower invertebrates, ultimately leading to the removal of the pathogen. The key effector molecules include reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, antimicrobial peptides, lectins, fibrinogen-related peptides, leucine-rich repeats (LRRs), and complement-related proteins. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are crucial to invertebrate defense as they can penetrate microbial pathogens membranes, causing cell death and effectively preventing infections. In this chapter, we explore the immune mechanisms of invertebrates, which differ significantly in their modes of action. We aim to understand how these mechanisms function and investigate whether they can be harnessed to benefit agriculture or combat pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40622552What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.