Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40622548›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2025

Interactions Between the Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses.

Andrew J T George, Ahmad Al Aiyan, Basel K Al-Ramadi, Uday Kishore

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew J T GeorgeDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. a.george@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2866-0241
Ahmad Al AiyanDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1882-3246
Basel K Al-RamadiDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Uday KishoreDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6033-6759

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adaptive and innate immune responses of vertebrates should not be considered separate independent systems but as interacting components of one system that provide complementary information to direct an inflammatory and immune response appropriately. In this chapter, we will examine two examples, the role of dendritic cell and T cell interactions and how complement functions with the humoral arm of the adaptive immune response.The innate immune response recognises molecules that are expressed on all pathogens, or damaged cells. It is commonly considered a rapid arm of the immune system, which responds swiftly in an antigen non-specific manner. This is in contrast to adaptive immunity, which is antigen specific and can take days to weeks to become effective due to the need for clonal expansion of antigen-specific T and B cells.The interaction of the dendritic cell with the naïve T cell is one of the central interactions of the immune system, as it provides the sole way in which the naïve T cell can be activated, thus initiating the T cell response. The outcome of this interaction is dependent on the phenotype of the dendritic cell, which is in itself a consequence of the interactions that the dendritic cell has had with molecules in its environment. For example, if the dendritic cell has been activated by molecules released from pathogens or damaged cells, then it will be activated and express co-stimulatory molecules that activate the T cell. It will also secrete cytokines that direct the differentiation of the T cell in a particular direction. This interaction can, therefore, be considered to have innate components, which provide context for the immune response, and adaptive components that provide specificity.The complement system contributes to defence against pathogens through interaction of molecules with components of cell surfaces that lead to activation of cascade in the presence of microbes. However, the complement system also contributes to humoral immunity through the classical pathway of activation, and through its role in B cell activation, affinity maturation and memory.This divide of the immune system into innate and adaptive responses can give the impression of two parallel immune systems, which sometimes interact. This is false. It is perhaps better to think about immune responses having both innate and adaptive components. Parts of the response recognise antigen in a specific manner, and other parts are activated by the context, the environment (presence of pathogens, damage, etc.). It is the coordination of these two components that are vital for effective immunological responses.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityDendritic CellsImmunity, InnateAnimalsB-LymphocytesComplement System ProteinsHumansT-LymphocytesComplement System ProteinsAdaptive immunityComplementDendritic cellInnate immunityPattern recognising receptors

Identifiers

PMID40622548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.