SynthesisNeuropsychology review2026
A Systematic Review of Available Normative Data on Neuropsychological Tests for Spanish Speakers in the U.S., Latin America and the Caribbean, and Spain.
Synthesis in Neuropsychology review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive profiles and predictors of cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: integrating self-reported, neuropsychological, and process-based measures.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2026Article
- Cognitive Testing in Spanish Older Adults: A Scoping Review.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Linking Motor and Cognitive Decline in Aging: Gait Variability and Working Memory as Early Markers of Frailty.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Latin American Spanish PACC5 (LAS-PACC5): Advancing Cognitive Assessment in Latinos.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuropsychological testing is an essential tool in clinical settings engaged in detecting, treating, or preventing neurocognitive disorders around the world. There is a need for accurate norms across cultures, including Latinx/Hispanic communities. We reviewed studies published in English or Spanish focused on acquiring normative data for Spanish-speaking individuals in the United States (U.S.), Latin America and the Caribean (LAC), and Spain. We searched available studies from Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO APA, Science Direct, and ProQuest up to October 31, 2024. Studies were imported to COVIDENCE and reviewed by two Spanish-English bilingual reviewers and one proficient English reviewer. Ultimately, 75 articles were included and categorized into U.S. (n = 23), LAC (n = 21), Spain (n = 23), and multiregional (n = 8) based. Overall, most studies included a cognitively normal/healthy sample to establish the normative data, adjusting or stratifying for age, education, and sex. In Spanish speakers, cognitive performance improved with advancing age in children and adolescents and declined with age in adults. Higher education was also associated with better performance on tests across regions. While this review highlights the increasing accumulation of norms for Spanish-speaking populations, there is a continued need to expand norms to other Spanish-speaking populations not included in this analysis. Future research should add variables, such as acculturation and bilingualism, to aid normative rigor. This review works as a tool to facilitate and improve the understanding of current normative data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.