ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025
Evaluation of AI-based detection of incidental pulmonary emboli in cardiac CT angiography scans.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Incidental pulmonary embolism (PE) is detected in 1% of cardiac CT angiography (CCTA) scans, despite the targeted aortic opacification and limited field of view. While artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have proven effective in detecting PE in CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA), their use in CCTA remains unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of an AI algorithm for detecting incidental PE in CCTA scans. A dedicated AI algorithm was retrospectively applied to CCTA scans to detect PE. Radiology reports were reviewed using a natural language processing (NLP) tool to detect mentions of PE. Discrepancies between the AI and radiology reports triggered a blinded review by a cardiothoracic radiologist. All scans identified as positive for PE were thoroughly assessed for radiographic features, including the location of emboli and right ventricular (RV) strain. The performance of the AI algorithm for PE detection was compared to the original radiology report. Between 2021 and 2023, 1534 CCTA scans were analyzed. The AI algorithm identified 27 positive PE scans, with a subsequent review confirming PE in 22/27 cases. Of these, 10 (45.5%) were missed in the initial radiology report, all involving segmental or subsegmental arteries (P < 0.05) with no evidence of RV strain. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using an AI algorithm to detect incidental PE in CCTA scans. A notable radiology report miss rate (45.5%) of segmental and subsegmental emboli was documented. While these findings emphasize the potential value of AI for PE detection in the daily radiology workflow, further research is needed to fully determine its clinical impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.