Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40622458›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2025

Accuracy of no-history formulae for intraocular lens power calculation in post-myopic laser vision correction eyes: a multicenter study in Japan.

So Goto, Yosai Mori, Hidemasa Torii, Yumi Hasegawa, Takashi Kojima, Kazutaka Kamiya, Takuya Shiba, Kazunori Miyata

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. IOL Power Calculation Formulas in Post-LASIK Eyes Using Two Biometry Systems in Vietnam.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

So GotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Room E7, Yamadaoka 2-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. gotoso@ophthal.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4171-0781
Yosai MoriMiyata Eye Hospital, Kurahara 6-3, Miyakonojo, Miyazaki, 885-0051, Japan.
Hidemasa ToriiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi , Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Yumi HasegawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.
Takashi KojimaNagoya Eye Clinic, 24-14 Namiyose, Atsuta-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 456-0003, Japan.
Kazutaka KamiyaSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Visual Physiology, Kitasato University, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0373, Japan.
Takuya ShibaRoppongi Shiba Eye Clinic, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazunori MiyataMiyata Eye Hospital, Kurahara 6-3, Miyakonojo, Miyazaki, 885-0051, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the refractive prediction accuracy of seven no-history intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas in post-myopic laser vision correction (M-LVC) eyes in Japanese patients. STUDY

designMulticenter retrospective case series.

methodsThis study included patients with previous M-LVC who underwent cataract surgery between 2016 and 2023. IOL power calculation formulas were assessed using measurements from a swept-source optical coherence biometer. Refractive prediction errors were calculated for the Emmetropia Verifying Optical 2.0 (EVO 2.0), Post Myopic LASIK/PRK Hoffer QST (Hoffer QST), and Post-M-LVC PEARL-DGS (PEARL-DGS) formulas. These results were compared with those obtained from the Barrett True-K No History (BTKNH), Haigis-L, Shammas, and ASCRS average formulas. Heteroscedastic testing for root mean square absolute error (RMSAE) was used to evaluate formula performance.

resultsThe study comprised 125 post-LASIK eyes from 89 patients. Only the BTKNH had mean numerical errors not significantly different from zero. The formulas were ranked by absolute prediction error (MAE): ASCRS average (0.42 D), BTKNH (0.43 D), Hoffer QST (0.46 D), Pearl-DGS and Shammas (0.46 D), EVO 2.0 (0.48 D), and Haigis-L (0.51 D). The BTKNH and ASCRS average demonstrated smaller RMSAE compared to Shammas (P < .0001). The Hoffer QST had a smaller RMSAE than Pearl-DGS (P = 0.02).

conclusionThe BTKNH, ASCRS average, and Hoffer QST formulas are precise and reliable for improving postoperative refractive outcomes in Japanese patients with a history of M-LVC.

Indexed as

BiometryKeratomileusis, Laser In SituLenses, IntraocularLens Implantation, IntraocularMyopiaOptics and PhotonicsRefraction, OcularVisual AcuityAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsCataract surgeryIOL power calculationJapanese eyePost-myopic laser vision correction

Identifiers

PMID40622458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.