SynthesisCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026
Exploring the relationships between nutrition and brain health among Indigenous Peoples in North America: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis systematic review synthesizes extant literature that examines relationships between nutrition and brain health in Indigenous populations in North America and further assesses the extent to which Indigenous research paradigms and community engagement processes have been employed.
methodsWe searched five databases for primary research studies that examined indices of diet/nutrients in relation to brain health and focused on Indigenous populations in North America. Quality appraisal was performed using the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Quality Appraisal Tool as well as the Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies, the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Control Studies, or the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Cohort Study Checklist. SYNTHESIS: Of the 564 articles identified in the search, 16 met inclusion criteria. Ten studies focused on Inuit populations, 2 focused on the residents of Grassy Narrows First Nation, 2 focused on Cree populations, and 2 focused on Quileute, Makah, and Quinault First Nations populations. Fourteen studies reported deleterious effects of dietary contaminants (e.g., mercury, lead, polychlorinated biphenyls) on brain health outcomes and three studies reported beneficial effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on brain health outcomes.
conclusionFindings of this review highlight the neurotoxic effects of environmental contaminants and the beneficial effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in traditional Indigenous food sources on a range of brain health outcomes. However, given the methodological limitations of the studies reviewed and the lack of community-based research that employs Indigenous research paradigms, results should be interpreted with caution. There is a clear need for strength-based research that examines the positive effects of nutrients within traditional Indigenous foods on brain health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.