Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40622426›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2025

Interaction Between Different Amoebae and Pseudomonas sp. Impacts Rice Plant Growth and Phosphorus Dynamics.

Komal A Chandarana, Salim Manoharadas, Muthu Tiruvengadam, Natarajan Amaresan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Komal A ChandaranaC. G. Bhakta Institute of Biotechnology, Uka Tarsadia University, Maliba Campus, Bardoli, Surat, Gujarat, 394350, India.
Salim ManoharadasDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2454, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Muthu TiruvengadamDepartment of Crop Science, College of Sanghuh Life Science, Konkuk University, Seoul, 05029, Korea.
Natarajan AmaresanC. G. Bhakta Institute of Biotechnology, Uka Tarsadia University, Maliba Campus, Bardoli, Surat, Gujarat, 394350, India. na.amaresan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3652-6090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microorganisms play a key role in mineralizing phosphorus (P) in the soil, thereby reduces the P deficiency in plants. However, it is largely unknown how the interactions between phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and bacterivorous protists influence P dynamics. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate the interactive impact of phosphate-solubilizing Pseudomonas sp. (Ps) and three amoebae species (Vermamoeba vermiformis (A9), Acanthamoeba lenticulata (A10), and Acanthamoeba genotype T4 (A23)) on P dynamics in soil and plants. A significant enhancement in plant growth parameters was observed in amoebae-Ps combined treatments compared to the control and Ps alone treatments. The combined A10Ps (A. lenticulata + Pseudomonas sp.) and A23Ps (Acanthamoeba genotype T4 + Pseudomonas sp.) had a greater effect on plant P uptake (4.40 mg g

Indexed as

AcanthamoebaAmoebaOryzaPhosphorusPseudomonasSoilSoil MicrobiologyPhosphorusSoil

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.