ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2025
Preferences for TB treatment and support delivery models among people living with TB in Eastern Cape, South Africa: a discrete choice experiment.
Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hidden in Success: Gendered Patterns of Suboptimal Care Engagement Among Tuberculosis Patients Who "Successfully" Completed Treatment in South Africa.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Article
- Quality of life among people with tuberculosis in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: a qualitative study.BMC global and public health · 2026Article
- Hidden in Success: Gendered Patterns of Suboptimal Care Engagement Among TB Patients Who "Successfully" Completed Treatment in South Africa.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Build, do not dismantle: leveraging a differentiated service delivery approach for broader health impact amidst funding changes.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSouth Africa has one of the highest incidence rates of notified tuberculosis (TB) in the world. Achieving TB control requires strengthening treatment and support services. The implementation of differentiated delivery models can be used to improve service quality and enhance retention in care. This study aimed to identify treatment and support delivery preferences among people on TB treatment, specifically examining gender differences, to inform the development of differentiated care models for improving engagement and retention in TB treatment services.
methodsA binary, unlabelled, fractional factorial design discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to investigate preferences for TB treatment adherence support and service delivery. Attributes included who provides the support, how and where support is delivered, medication collection location and frequency of clinic visits. The DCE was administered to individuals who were currently on or recently completed TB treatment, and to those at-risk for being lost-to-care. Data from 284 individuals for the DCE were collected from March to August 2022. Mixed effects logistic regression models were used as primary analysis tools. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to explore heterogeneity in preference structures.
resultsCompared to standard clinic-based treatment collection, participants preferred collecting their treatment from a mobile community-based location (ß = 0.231; 95% CI: 0.08-0.39), clinic-based fast-tracked pick-ups (ß = 0.539; 95% CI: 0.38-0.70) or home delivery (ß = 0.563; 95% CI: 0.37-0.75). Participants also significantly preferred support offered monthly compared to once-off (ß = 0.167; 95% CI: 0.01-0.32). Furthermore, participants preferred face-to-face support over group (ß = -0.142; 95% CI: -0.27 to -0.02) or phone-based (ß = -0.222; 95% CI: -0.36 to -0.09) support models. LCA revealed three classes with statistically similar preference structures; Class 1 (62%) preferred community-based treatment delivery and support services; Class 2 (28%) preferred clinic-based support and treatment delivery services; and Class 3 (10%), preferred self-selected peer navigator or nurse delivered, and group models of support and prioritised the location of medication pickups, with a preference for any model other than standard clinic collection.
conclusionsThough preference structures did not differ by gender, respondents revealed strong preferences for differentiated service delivery models. Future TB treatment and support interventions must include both clinic- and community-based models of care and support to ensure that those living with TB are provided the greatest access to TB treatment and support services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.