ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice2025
A Comprehensive Scoping Review of Technology in the Care of Historically Marginalized Populations With Asthma: A Work Group Report of the AAAAI Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committee.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealth care technology strategies are increasingly being used in research and clinical care in asthma. The use of technology in addressing asthma disparities has not been reported.
objectiveTo determine the effect of technology in historically marginalized racial and ethnic populations with asthma.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies that included the use of health technology in patients with asthma from historically marginalized populations. Authors reviewed studies to determine study characteristics and intervention efficacy according to predetermined outcome measures. Studies were categorized as generalized, unidirectional, or bidirectional according to the degree to which they used personalized participant data.
resultsA total of 1516 studies were initially identified, with 44 studies included in the final analysis. Most studies included a majority Black population, followed by Latino population. Bidirectional studies that collect patient-specific data and provide tailored recommendations, education, or treatment options were most effective as compared with generalized and unidirectional studies. No specific technology methodology was found to be superior to others, though technology modalities that used personalized participant data and allowed for bidirectional information exchange were more effective than those that relied on generalized data.
conclusionHealth care technology strategies can provide an avenue to decrease asthma disparities in historically marginalized populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.