Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40622259›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe2025

Evaluating Haptic Virtual Reality Simulator for Pulpotomy Training in Primary Teeth: A Pilot Study on Dental Student Pespectives.

Juan Ignacio Aura-Tormos, M Angeles Vello-Ribes, Neus Frechina-Borras, M Dolores Casaña-Ruiz, Montserrat Catalá-Pizarro

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Beyond the Drill: Can Digital Gadgets Redefine the Future of Dental Education?European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juan Ignacio Aura-TormosDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0054-1005
M Angeles Vello-RibesDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Neus Frechina-BorrasDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
M Dolores Casaña-RuizDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Montserrat Catalá-PizarroDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate dental students' perspectives of using haptic virtual reality simulator (HVRS) in the training of pulpotomy procedures in primary teeth, and to compare its perceived educational effectiveness with conventional mannequin-based simulator. MATERIAL AND

methodsTwenty-four fourth-year dental students from the University of Valencia were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 12 each). One group performed pulpotomy training first with a mannequin-based model and then with HVRS, while the other group followed the reverse sequence. Both training modalities involved standardised instruction and hands-on practice. Following both sessions, participants completed a 12-item Likert-scale survey assessing perspectives of realism, skill acquisition, confidence and overall satisfaction. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U tests and Spearman correlation analyses were used to examine group differences and item associations. In addition to self-reported data, procedural timing was also recorded to provide complementary objective insight into student performance.

resultsStudents in the HVRS group reported significantly higher agreement on items related to tactile realism, differentiation of tooth structures and improvement of fine motor skills. Strong correlations were observed between perceived realism and confidence (ρ = 0.88), as well as between satisfaction and the desire to apply HVRS in additional procedures (ρ = 1.00). The internal consistency of the questionnaire was high (Cronbach's α = 0.91).

conclusionsHVRS was perceived as a realistic and motivating tool for pulpotomy training in paediatric dentistry. Students highlighted its value as a complementary method to conventional simulators, supporting psychomotor skill development and learner confidence. These findings suggest that HVRS may enhance educational outcomes when integrated into preclinical dental curricula.

Indexed as

Education, DentalPulpotomySimulation TrainingStudents, DentalTooth, DeciduousVirtual RealityClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansMaleManikinsPilot Projectsdental educationhaptic simulationpaediatric dentistrypreclinical trainingpulpotomystudent perceptionsvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID40622259
PMCPMC12287986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.